Ceramic is one of the best materials that can be used in a hip replacement but when paired with a metal socket it quickly falls to the back of the pack.
Ceramic on ceramic vs metal on metal hip.
The metasul group included thirty patients with a mean age of forty.
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between ceramic on ceramic total hip replacement and metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty in comparable groups of young.
Thirty nine cementless hip arthroplasties using metal on metal articulation were consecutively implanted in 30 patients less than 50.
Metal on metal versus ceramic on polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age.
Any hip replacement device with either a metal socket or ball will result in metal wear particles in your bloodstream.
Sedel presented an overview of ceramic on ceramic hip bearings and a 20 year study on the coupling at the sicot xxv triennial world congress 2011.
Thirty nine metal on metal cementless hip replacements with a 28 mm diameter metasul articulation were compared with a control group that included thirty nine cementless ceramic on polyethylene hip replacements performed with a 28 mm diameter head.
A ceramic versus metal femoral head on a polyethylene lin.
The advantages of ceramic on ceramic are great.
A ceramic femoral head and a ceramic lining ceramic on ceramic in addition during june 2011 the fda approved a new ceramic on metal system.
Ese groups after a minimum duration of follow up of twelve years.
The extreme hardness of this type of ceramic offers greater scratch resistance than the conventional implants used in conventional hip replacements 1 ceramic on ceramic surfaces have demonstrated significantly lower wear versus conventional plastic on metal hip systems in the laboratory 2 therefore it is anticipated that these improved wear.
The world s first ceramic on metal hip implant has been given approval by the fda usa food and drug administration.
A comparative study with twelve to fourteen year follow up.